Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622245›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Agptools: a utility suite for editing genome assemblies.

Edward S Ricemeyer, Rachel A Carroll, Wesley C Warren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Programmed DNA elimination was present in the last common ancestor ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward S RicemeyerBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65221, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-217X
Rachel A CarrollBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65221, United States.
Wesley C WarrenBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65221, United States.

Funding

National Science Foundation NSF DBI 1940624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryThe AGP format is a tab-separated table format describing how components of a genome assembly fit together. A standard submission format for genome assemblies is a fasta file giving the sequence of contigs along with an AGP file showing how these components are assembled into larger pieces like scaffolds or chromosomes. For this reason, many scaffolding software pipelines output assemblies in this format. However, although many programs for assembling and scaffolding genomes read and write this format, there is currently no published software for making edits to AGP files when performing assembly curation. We present agptools, a suite of command-line programs that can perform common operations on AGP files, such as breaking and joining sequences, inverting pieces of assembly components, assembling contigs into larger sequences based on an AGP file, and transforming between coordinate systems of different assembly layouts. Additionally, agptools includes an API that writers of other software packages can use to read, write, and manipulate AGP files within their own programs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and binaries freely available for download at https://github.com/WarrenLab/agptools, implemented in Python and supported on all operating systems.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID40622245
PMCPMC12286700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.