ArticleJournal of patient safety2025
Rethinking Anesthesia Medication "Errors": The OR-SMART Patient Safety Learning Laboratory.
Article in Journal of patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe combine the results of multiple studies to describe a systems engineering approach to a well-recognized patient safety problem. The goal of the Operating Room Systems-based Medication Administration error Reduction Team (OR-SMART) patient safety learning laboratory was to study the anesthesia medication work system to identify the characteristics of technologies and interventions that might feasibly reduce anesthesia medication errors. SCOPE: The work was conducted at 2 large urban academic medical centers: Johns Hopkins and the Medical University of South Carolina. We sampled across many different types of anesthesia work, understanding the challenges of work-as-done, and applying systems safety principles and evaluation frameworks.
methodsThis was a mixed-methods study. Sources of data varied, with formal and informal interviews, formal and informal observations, video-based observations, hospital and national databases, and information from local incidents. Clinically embedded human factors professionals at both hospital sites facilitated informal sources of data. We explored the variable definitions of error; individual and organizational variability in decision-making; how syringes are used, stored, and moved within an operating room (OR); and used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety framework to model medication processes. We were able to identify more than 100 possible interventions, and then prioritized a few for development and testing.
resultsWe identified medication icon labels, a syringe holder hub, and workspace design guidelines as interventions for evaluation. Significant benefits of medication label icons were found in simulation and were highly utilized in practice. The syringe hub demonstrated high acceptability at one site but substantially less at another. A virtual reality-based evaluation of the OR design found that situational awareness, visual monitoring, and available workspace were subjectively improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.