Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622219›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Stimulus-dependent delay of perceptual filling-in by microsaccades.

Max Levinson, Christopher C Pack, Sylvain Baillet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max LevinsonMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Christopher C PackMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Sylvain BailletMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

BrainStorm: Highly Extensible Software for Advanced Electrophysiology and MEG/EEG ImagingR01EB026299 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LEAHY, RICHARD M · 2018 to 2025
$5.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception is a function of both stimulus features and active sensory sampling. The illusion of perceptual filling-in occurs when eye gaze is kept still: visual boundary perception may fail, causing adjacent visual features to remarkably merge into one uniform visual surface. Microsaccades-small, involuntary eye movements during gaze fixation-counteract perceptual filling-in, but the mechanisms underlying this process are not well-understood. We investigated whether microsaccade efficacy for preventing filling-in depends on two boundary properties, namely, color contrast and retinal eccentricity (distance from gaze center). Twenty-one human participants (male and female) fixated on a point until they experienced filling-in between two isoluminant colored surfaces. We found that increased color contrast independently extends the duration before filling-in, but does not alter the impact of individual microsaccades. Conversely, lower eccentricity delayed filling-in only by increasing microsaccade efficacy. We propose that microsaccades facilitate stable boundary perception via a transient retinal motion signal that scales with eccentricity but is invariant to boundary contrast. These results shed light on how incessant eye movements integrate with ongoing stimulus processing to stabilize perceptual detail, with implications for visual rehabilitation and the optimization of visual presentations in virtual and augmented reality environments.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionFixation, OcularSaccadesVisual PerceptionAdultContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40622219
PMCPMC12248979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.