Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622218›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Computational evidence for an inverse relationship between retinal and brain complexity.

Mitchell B Slapik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mitchell B SlapikDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR003169 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHANDRA, JOYA, FROST, JEFFREY A. · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
Optimal Stimuli as a New Method to Investigate Neural NetworksF30EY035603 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Mitchell Benjamin Slapik · 2023 to 2026
$122k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR003169NEI NIH HHS F30 EY035603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual neuroscientists have long observed an inverse relationship between brain and retinal complexity: As brain complexity increases across species, retinas adapt to simpler visual processing. Lindsey et al. previously provided a computational explanation for this pattern, showing that shallow networks encode complex features in their first stage of processing, whereas deep networks encode simpler features. Here, these findings are extended to a suite of representational analyses and show that shallow networks generate high-dimensional representations with linear decision boundaries and specific visual features that can feed directly into behavioral responses. In contrast, deep networks generate low-dimensional representations with nonlinear decision boundaries and general visual features. These representations require further processing before they can produce the appropriate behavioral response. In summary, the findings extend a longstanding principle linking simpler retinal features to complex brains and offer a computational framework for understanding neural network behavior more generally.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNerve NetRetinaVisual PerceptionAnimalsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID40622218
PMCPMC12240199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.