ArticleJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2026
Comparison of Methods used for Final Height Prediction in Patients with Central Precocious Puberty
Article in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Various methods may be used to estimate target height in patients diagnosed with precocious puberty. These methods include the Bayley-Pinneau (BP) and Roche-Wainer-Thissen (RWT) methods. In addition to these methods, in our clinic, we routinely use a practical approach based on the percentiles in growth charts. In this method, the bone age percentile is projected to the end of the percentile curve (at 18 years of age) to estimate the final adult height. We have named this method Bone Age Percentile Curve Projected Height Estimation (BAPCPHE). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of these three methods in predicting target height in patients treated for central precocious puberty and who have reached their final height in our pediatric endocrinology clinic. Methods: Fifty female patients were included. The predicted adult heights (PAH) were calculated at treatment initiation, at the end of the first, second, and third years of treatment, and at the time of final height attainment using the BP, RWT, and BAPCPHE methods, based on the patients’ heights and bone ages. Results: When the agreement between the PAH calculated by three methods and the final height was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient, significant agreement was found for PAH using the BAPCPHE method in the third year. Among the methods, the strongest agreement with final height and PAH was observed with the BP method at the end of treatment, followed by the BAPCPHE method. Conclusion: The BAPCPHE method allows estimation of PAH quickly, making it a valuable tool in the outpatient setting. Given its simplicity and accuracy, we find the BAPCPHE method preferable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.