Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40622078›Full record

Trial reportJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2025

Cyanoacrylate Adhesive in Free Gingival Graft Healing: A Digital and Microcirculatory Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zeynep Turgut Çankaya, Sühan Gürbüz, Evşen Tamam

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cyanoacrylate Adhesive in Free Gingival Graft Healing: A Digital and Microcirculatory Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zeynep Turgut ÇankayaDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-9755
Sühan GürbüzDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2277-2020
Evşen TamamDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3696-6734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of n-butyl cyanoacrylate (CA) in stabilizing free gingival grafts (FGGs) without sutures at the recipient site and accelerating postoperative healing at the donor site. Additionally, perfusion dynamics and graft shrinkage were assessed using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and digital impression techniques.

methodsThis randomized controlled clinical trial included 40 systemically healthy, non-smoking patients with insufficient keratinized tissue in the mandibular region. Patients were randomly assigned to the test group (FGG stabilized with CA) or the control group (FGG secured with sutures). Periodontal parameters, intraoperative durations, LDF values at recipient and donor sites, graft shrinkage (digital impression), and postoperative pain (VAS scores) were recorded.

resultsGraft shrinkage was significantly lower in the CA group (37.23%) than in the control group (45.15%) (p < 0.001). The test group exhibited significantly higher LDF values at the donor site on days 4 and 7, suggesting enhanced perfusion and early vascularization (p = 0.002, p < 0.001). Postoperative pain (VAS scores) was significantly lower in the CA group until day 6 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, FGG stabilization time was three times shorter in the CA group than in the control group (p < 0.001). By day 30, perfusion values equalized between groups, indicating that CA did not negatively impact long-term tissue healing.

conclusionN-butyl cyanoacrylate provides a rapid, reliable, and minimally traumatic alternative to sutures for FGG stabilization. Its use may reduce graft shrinkage, enhance early vascularization, minimize postoperative pain, and shorten surgical time. These findings support CA as a promising wound dressing and stabilizer in periodontal plastic surgery. However, further randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate its long-term effects.

Indexed as

CyanoacrylatesEnbucrilateGingivaMicrocirculationTissue AdhesivesWound HealingAdultFemaleHumansLaser-Doppler FlowmetryMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainCyanoacrylatesEnbucrilateTissue Adhesivescyanoacrylatefree gingival graftgraft shrinkagelaser doppler flowmetryperiodontal surgerytissue adhesiveswound healing

Identifiers

PMID40622078
PMCPMC12538200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.