ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Association of a Brief Computerized Cognitive Assessment With Cholinergic Neurotransmission: Assessment Validation Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04149457 (Improving Neurological Health in Aging Via Neuroplasticity-based Computerized Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Neurological Health in Aging Via Neuroplasticity-based Computerized Exercise (INHANCE)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construct Validation of a Remote Brain Health Assessment Battery to Evaluate Vocational Aptitude and Factors Associated With Cognitive Resilience in the Military: Observational Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Computerized cognitive assessments are most often validated against standard neuropsychological measures with limited validation against biological indices of brain health. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether a self-administered computerized cognitive assessment is associated with cholinergic neurotransmission using the vesicular acetylcholine transporter ligand [18F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol (FEOBV) and positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: In a retrospective analysis, we report baseline data from the Improving Neurological Health in Aging via Neuroplasticity-Based Computerized Exercise (INHANCE) trial. This study provides normative data for healthy older adults aged 65 years and above. We evaluate the validity of the Double Decision cognitive assessment (from the BrainHQ assessment platform) by examining its association with tracer binding in the anterior cingulate cortex, as measured by FEOBV-PET. We also assess concurrent validity with neuropsychological performance using standardized measures of executive function and global cognition. Results: The intent-to-treat population from the INHANCE trial analyzed in this study included 92 healthy adults with a mean age of 71.9 (SD 4.86, range 65-83) years, the majority of whom were female (61/92, 66%), with an average of 16.45 (SD 3.40, range 9-27) years of education. The Double Decision assessment is associated with FEOBV binding in the anterior cingulate cortex, explaining 8% of the variance, and was associated with neuropsychological performance measures. The assessment was sensitive to age and was not influenced by education level or gender. Psychometric properties supported its usability and the assessment showed an average completion time of 3 (SD 1.12) minutes. Conclusions: We present the first brief, self-administered computerized cognitive assessment associated with cholinergic network health. This tool is scalable and accessible to individuals with an internet-connected device, offering a practical and cost-efficient approach to cognitive screening. The findings provide valuable insights into brain health, particularly for early detection of cognitive decline, and hold significant potential for broad applications across both clinical and nonclinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.