ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Bead beating demonstrates enhanced bacterial detection in kidney stone culture compared to traditional mortar-pestle processing.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a standard operation for treating large kidney stones but carries a risk of postoperative infection. Recent guidelines recommend obtaining a stone culture or kidney stone culture, yet no standardized protocol exists for processing kidney stones. Bead beating (BB) is a standardizable method of specimen preparation technique, which has been utilized for bacterial culture in other fields, but its application to kidney stone cultures is novel. Sixty kidney stone specimens were collected prospectively from patients undergoing PCNL, and each specimen was processed by either BB or mortar and pestle (MP). Following homogenization, samples were cultured with the standard procedure for a high-quality urine culture. Microorganisms were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and quantified following standard laboratory procedures. Statistical comparisons were performed using McNemar's test and paired IMPORTANCE: This study provides a rapid and standardized method for kidney stone culture using bead beating, which significantly improves microbial detection compared to traditional mortar-pestle techniques. This method accelerates processing and enhances sensitivity for identifying microbes present in kidney stones, offering the potential for more accurate diagnoses. By providing a robust and efficient protocol, it paves the way for standardized practices across laboratories and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.