Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621793›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2025

A Medium to Long-Term Study Comparing Stress Urinary Incontinence Procedures.

Ifeoma Offiah, D Carolina Ochoa, Jennifer M Alvarado, Millie Mercer, Chendrimada Madhu, Herney A Garcia-Perdomo, Hashim Hashim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ifeoma OffiahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3233-9848
D Carolina OchoaBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Jennifer M AlvaradoDivision of Urology/Urooncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Millie MercerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Chendrimada MadhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Herney A Garcia-PerdomoDivision of Urology/Urooncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-8261
Hashim HashimBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2467-407X

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesConcerns remain regarding the safety of the retropubic tape (TVT) procedure. We assess the efficacy, satisfaction and long-term outcomes of the TVT procedure and compare it to the autologous fascial sling (AFS), colposuspension, and urethral bulking procedures.

methodsA review of prospective data of all patients post stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery in our tertiary center between January 2012 and December 2020 was performed. Patients were invited to complete three validated questionnaires: International Consultation of Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS), ICIQ Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS) and ICIQ satisfaction (ICIQ-S). Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate complications. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate satisfaction. KEY

findingsEight hundred fifty-three SUI procedures were performed in the study period. The responses from 395 questionnaires were analyzed. Median follow up: 5.9 years (range 1-10.1). The TVT and AFS procedures were the most efficacious procedures: 64% TVT, 62% AFS, 40% Colposuspension, 26% urethral bulking, p < 0.001. The AFS group had the lowest reported rate of complications: 22.6% AFS, 65.7% TVT, 67.1% colposuspension, 71.74% Urethral bulking (p < 0.001). Pain was the most reported complication and the AFS group had the lowest reporting of severe pain: 68% AFS, 74% TVT, 80% Colposuspension, 78% urethral bulking (p = 0.350). LIMITATIONS: Mesh exposure was not evaluated due to the lack of validated questionnaires.

conclusionThe AFS and TVT procedures are reported as the most successful procedures for the surgical management of SUI. Due to the associated risk of mesh complications, we recommend AFS as the procedure of choice for the surgical management of SUI.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressUrologic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment Outcomelower urinary tract symptomsmid‐urethral slingpatient reported outcome measurespost operative complicationsstress urinary incontinencesurgerysynthetic mesh

Identifiers

PMID40621793
PMCPMC12319477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.