Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621771›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Feeling lonely in the online crowd: what TikTok tells us about young people and loneliness.

Bethan Harries, Marco Zenone, Greg Hartwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bethan HarriesFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-1444-248X
Marco ZenoneSchool of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, 1855 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4201-6070
Greg HartwellFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-7126

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness is a pressing public health issue, with young people particularly affected. Given the widespread use of TikTok among younger demographics, the platform plays an influential role in shaping perceptions of health topics. This study examines the self-perceived causes and experiences of loneliness expressed by TikTok users. We built a dataset of the most popular, publicly available English-language TikTok videos globally that used the hashtag #lonely and performed a qualitative content analysis to assess (i) video tone, (ii) self-expressed identities related to loneliness, (iii) unmet desires expressed as the cause of loneliness, (iii) absences expressed as the cause of loneliness, and (v) changes in life circumstance as the cause of loneliness. The included videos (n = 184) generated over 687 million views. Absence (69.6%) was the prevailing theme of self-perceived causes of loneliness. This absence was mostly attributed to a lack of quality in a person's relationships (33.7%) or having no relationship (32.1%). Mental health (26.1%) was the most cited expression of identity related to the experience of loneliness. The overall sentiment of the videos was negative (83.2%). No videos were made by healthcare professionals or healthcare organizations offering health information or support. TikTok is an accessible, underutilized, and valuable data resource to understand the public portrayal and sentiment of pressing health topics in young people. Results reveal a prevalence of negatively toned videos, primarily expressing absence as a root cause of loneliness.

Indexed as

LonelinessSocial MediaAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthSelf ConceptYoung Adultdigital healthlonelinessmental healthpublic healthsocial mediaTikTok

Identifiers

PMID40621771
PMCPMC12230692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.