ArticleCurrent gene therapy2026
Machine Learning-Driven PCDI Classifier for Invasive PitNETs.
Article in Current gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- BRSK2 accumulation mediated by TRIM28 accelerates hepatocellular carcinoma progression via activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- The evolution and application of multi-omic analysis for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAggressive Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNETs) pose significant therapeutic challenges due to their invasive behavior and resistance to conventional therapies. Current prognostic markers lack the ability to capture molecular heterogeneity, necessitating novel biomarkers. Dysregulated Programmed Cell Death (PCD) pathways are implicated in tumorigenesis, but their prognostic relevance in invasive PitNETs remains unexplored.
methodsGEO datasets (GSE51618, GSE169498, GSE260487) were analyzed to identify differential gene expression between noninvasive and invasive PitNETs. A curated panel of 1,548 PCDrelated genes was integrated. Machine learning (LASSO regression and SVM-RFE) was employed to construct a PCD-associated Index (PCDI). For validation, ROC analysis, immune infiltration assessment (CIBERSORT, TIMER, ssGSEA), and experimental validation via RT-qPCR were performed.
resultsThe PCDI, comprising 11 genes (e.g., FGFR3, MAPK11, SLC7A11), distinguished invasive from noninvasive PitNETs with high accuracy. High-PCDI tumors exhibited enriched metabolic pathways and immune activation. Consensus clustering stratified PitNETs into two molecular subtypes (C1/C2), with C2 (high-PCDI) showing elevated immune scores and pathway activity. Experimental validation confirmed the differential expression of key genes in invasive tumors (*p<0.05). DISCUSSION: The PCDI outperforms traditional prognostic models by capturing PCD-immunemetabolic crosstalk. High-PCDI tumors demonstrate adaptive immune evasion despite an elevated checkpoint molecule expression, suggesting therapeutic potential for combined MAPK inhibitors and immunotherapy. Limitations include retrospective data and small validation cohorts.
conclusionThe PCDI provides a robust molecular framework for risk stratification and personalized therapy in invasive PitNETs. Future studies should validate its clinical utility and explore pancancer relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40621753What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.