Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621724›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025

Quantification Challenges in Polymer Analysis in Urban Runoff and Wastewater using Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Double-Shot Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Daniele Martuscelli, Jonas B Jensen, Luca Solari, Simona Francalanci, Peter Christensen, Jan H Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniele MartuscelliDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence, Via di Santa Marta, 3, Florence 50139, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8656-3781
Jonas B JensenAnalytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg 1871, Denmark.
Luca SolariDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence, Via di Santa Marta, 3, Florence 50139, Italy.
Simona FrancalanciDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence, Via di Santa Marta, 3, Florence 50139, Italy.
Peter ChristensenAnalytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg 1871, Denmark.
Jan H ChristensenAnalytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg 1871, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1414-1886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics are persistent environmental pollutants with potential risks to ecosystems and human health. This study optimized methods for isolating and quantifying polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS) in environmental water and wastewater samples using pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) combined with pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). The optimized two-step PLE protocol, consisting of methanol pre-extraction at 100 °C followed by tetrahydrofuran (THF) at 180 °C, achieved MP recoveries of 43-58%. Calibration curves were established using both solubilized and solid MP standards, with solubilized calibrations providing higher accuracy for PET and PP. Py-GC/MS conditions were optimized at 625 °C for 40 s to ensure maximum sensitivity and reproducibility. PE and PET were identified as the dominant MPs in the wastewater samples, with concentrations of 99.4 ± 71.8 μg/L and 16.2 ± 13.3 μg/L in Avedøre, and significantly higher levels of 749.0 ± 200.0 μg/L and 56.7 ± 22.6 μg/L in Pontedera. PP and PS were detected at lower concentrations, with PP ranging from 8.2 ± 4.2 μg/L to 16.9 ± 6.5 μg/L, and PS from 2.2 ± 1.5 μg/L to 8.4 ± 2.6 μg/L. Our results highlight the challenges of MP analysis in water samples, emphasizing the impact of key method parameters (e.g., MP isolation, pyrolysis, and calibration) on analytical reliability. The proposed method enhances MP detection in different water matrices, offering a reliable approach for routine environmental monitoring. Future efforts should focus on refining protocols to improve accuracy and precision and advancing standardization to ensure consistent and accurate MP quantification.

Identifiers

PMID40621724
PMCPMC12268836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.