ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Causal Relationship Between Depression and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Depression and risk of incident heart diseases among older adults at CKM stages 0-3: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis of the IL-1 Cytokine Family Proteins Identifies IL1RL1 as a Potential Causal Contributor to Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) and depression are major global health burdens, yet their bidirectional causal relationship remains unclear.
objectiveTo explore the causal relationship between depression and TBI, and to clarify whether depression is one of the potential risk factors for TBI and whether TBI is one of the pathogenic factors for depression.
methodsThis bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis investigated causal relationships between depression (n = 170,756) and TBI (n = 3193) using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics. Genetic instruments were selected as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with exposures (depression/TBI) and outcomes (TBI/depression) at genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10⁻⁶). The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method under fixed-effects and multiplicative random-effects models served as the primary analytical approach, with Cochran's Q test evaluating SNP heterogeneity. To address horizontal pleiotropy, MR-Egger regression and MR-PRESSO(MR Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier)outlier correction were applied. Sensitivity analyses included weighted median, penalized weighted median, maximum likelihood estimation, and leave-one-out validation to ensure robustness. All analyses were conducted using the TwoSampleMR package in R (v4.3.2), with effect estimates reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsMR analyses revealed bidirectional causal relationships between depression and TBI. In forward analyses, depression increased TBI risk across multiple IVW frameworks (fixed-effects IVW: OR = 1.137, 95% CI = 1.019-1.271, P = 0.022; multiplicative random-effects IVW: OR = 1.137, 95% CI = 1.014-1.277, P = 0.028), corroborated by maximum likelihood estimation (OR = 1.137, 95% CI = 1.017-1.274, P = 0.024). Reverse analyses demonstrated TBI's causal effect on depression through IVW models (fixed-effects: OR = 1.083, 95% CI = 1.036-1.131, P < 0.001; multiplicative random-effects: OR = 1.083, 95% CI = 1.043-1.124,P < 0.001) and penalized weighted median methods (OR = 1.079, 95% CI = 1.018-1.145, P = 0.011). Robustness was confirmed by null heterogeneity (Cochran's Q: forward P = 0.209, reverse P = 0.596) and absence of horizontal pleiotropy (MR-PRESSO: forward P = 0.218, reverse P = 0.672; MR-Egger intercepts: forward P = 0.661, reverse P = 0.874). All effect estimates remained stable in sensitivity analyses, supporting unconfounded causal inference.
conclusionOur MR analyses robustly demonstrate bidirectional causality: depression is a risk factor for TBI (OR = 1.137, 95% CI = 1.019-1.271), and TBI subsequently increases depression risk (OR = 1.083, 95% CI = 1.036-1.131), advocating integrated clinical monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.