Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621704›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025

Weighing in: Clinician and Patient Perspectives on Discussions of Expected Body Weights in Eating Disorder Treatment.

Agatha A Laboe, Ava Heyrman, Siena Vendlinski, Molly F Steinhoff, Sophia Kreckler, Caitlyn Ruud, Kate Walsh, Daniel W Grupe, James J Li, Katherine Schaumberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinician Practices in Determining Expected Body Weights Across Eating Disorders: A Mixed Methods Study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agatha A LaboeDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5089-4087
Ava HeyrmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4541-0105
Siena VendlinskiDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-0577-727X
Molly F SteinhoffDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8402-0492
Sophia KrecklerDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-5510-0449
Caitlyn RuudDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2031-1238
Kate WalshDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3996-2683
Daniel W GrupeCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4927-7572
James J LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8031-7216
Katherine SchaumbergDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3193-2233

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002375 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Vivek Prabhakaran · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
WUSTL Transdisciplinary Pre- and Postdoctoral Training Program in Obesity and Cardiovascular DiseaseT32HL130357 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2016 to 2025
$4.3M
Driven exercise and risk for eating disorders: A combined genetic and longitudinal epidemiological investigationK01MH123914 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SCHAUMBERG, KATHERINE · 2020 to 2023
$743k
Developmental pathways and treatment of OCD and anorexia: the role heightened performance monitoring and overcontrolF31MH137979 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Molly Fennig Steinhoff · 2025 to 2026
$83k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002375NCATS NIH HHS TL1TR002375NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL130357NIH HHS F31MH137979NIH HHS K01MH123914NIH HHS T32HL130357NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH137979NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH123914Psi Chi AWD00003347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinicians often determine an "expected body weight" (EBW) for patients who have lost weight due to an eating disorder (ED). However, there is inconsistent guidance and limited empirical research on when, how, and why to discuss EBWs with patients. This study explores clinician and patient perspectives on discussions of EBWs.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 multidisciplinary ED clinicians and 16 individuals with outpatient ED treatment experience in the past 6 months. Clinicians shared their experiences with and rationales for sharing EBWs with patients and patients' family members. Patients shared their experiences of being informed about their EBWs, factors influencing their comfort level discussing EBWs with clinicians, and perceived impact of these discussions on their recovery. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis with a critical realist lens.

resultsClinician and patient perspectives aligned regarding when, how, and why to hold these discussions. Both groups emphasized that these discussions should occur after patients have demonstrated engagement with recovery and underscored the importance of framing the EBW as one aspect of a holistic recovery. Additionally, clinicians and patients highlighted the potential therapeutic benefits of these discussions, while also acknowledging challenges relating to parental involvement and weight bias. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that when discussions of EBWs are approached intentionally-accounting for timing, framing, and individual patient needs-clinicians and patients see potential therapeutic benefit. Future research can focus on developing evidence-based guidelines for sharing EBWs, addressing patient willingness to be informed of their EBW, weight bias, and parental involvement.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBody WeightFeeding and Eating DisordersPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researcheating disorderseating disorder treatmentexpected body weightspatient‐centered carequalitative researchthematic analysistherapeutic allianceweight restoration

Identifiers

PMID40621704
PMCPMC12247145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.