ArticleMolecular ecology2025
Genomic Evaluation of Assisted Gene Flow Options in an Endangered Rattlesnake.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Evolutionary Potential of Endangered Populations Using Genomic Analyses of Selection in Ecologically Important Gene Regions.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Genomics and genetic rescue.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The Golden Lancehead Genome Reveals Distinct Selective Processes Acting on Venom Genes of an Island Endemic Snake.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assisted gene flow is used to counteract genetic erosion in small populations of endangered species, yet an evaluation of genetic compatibility of potential donor populations and recipient populations is rare. We developed new metrics for assessing the genetic impact of genetic augmentation based on genotype identity of functional variants between donor and recipient genomes and used these metrics to evaluate options for assisted gene flow in Eastern Massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus) populations in Ohio, USA. We used putatively deleterious variants and genetic variants likely under positive selection (termed 'adaptive' variants) as the two components of functional variation. For potential donor and recipient populations, we estimated three key aspects of genetic compatibility: (a) introduction of novel variants, (b) masking or unmasking of existing deleterious variants and (c) potential for outbreeding depression through disruption of local adaptation. The main impact of augmentation from diverse donor populations was to introduce novel deleterious variants and to a lesser extent novel adaptive variants into each recipient population. Both donor populations had a similar minor impact in terms of masking existing deleterious variants. Finally, only ~7% of adaptive variants show evidence for local adaptation, arguing that the negative effect of outbreeding depression would be small. These results draw attention to the importance of considering the potential impact of both deleterious and adaptive genetic variants in augmentation efforts and suggest that in the case of these endangered rattlesnakes, the net effect of proposed assisted gene flow may lead to an increase in absolute levels of mutation load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.