Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621693›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

Genomic Evaluation of Assisted Gene Flow Options in an Endangered Rattlesnake.

Samarth Mathur, H Lisle Gibbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genomics and genetic rescue.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samarth MathurDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6446-5718
H Lisle GibbsDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7461-3393

Funding

Ohio Division of Wildlife, Ohio Department of Natural Resources WASR 36
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assisted gene flow is used to counteract genetic erosion in small populations of endangered species, yet an evaluation of genetic compatibility of potential donor populations and recipient populations is rare. We developed new metrics for assessing the genetic impact of genetic augmentation based on genotype identity of functional variants between donor and recipient genomes and used these metrics to evaluate options for assisted gene flow in Eastern Massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus) populations in Ohio, USA. We used putatively deleterious variants and genetic variants likely under positive selection (termed 'adaptive' variants) as the two components of functional variation. For potential donor and recipient populations, we estimated three key aspects of genetic compatibility: (a) introduction of novel variants, (b) masking or unmasking of existing deleterious variants and (c) potential for outbreeding depression through disruption of local adaptation. The main impact of augmentation from diverse donor populations was to introduce novel deleterious variants and to a lesser extent novel adaptive variants into each recipient population. Both donor populations had a similar minor impact in terms of masking existing deleterious variants. Finally, only ~7% of adaptive variants show evidence for local adaptation, arguing that the negative effect of outbreeding depression would be small. These results draw attention to the importance of considering the potential impact of both deleterious and adaptive genetic variants in augmentation efforts and suggest that in the case of these endangered rattlesnakes, the net effect of proposed assisted gene flow may lead to an increase in absolute levels of mutation load.

Indexed as

CrotalusEndangered SpeciesGene FlowGenetics, PopulationAnimalsGenetic VariationGenomicsGenotypeOhioSelection, Geneticassisted gene flowconservation genomicsfunctional genomic variationgenetic rescueSistrurus catenatus

Identifiers

PMID40621693
PMCPMC12329626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.