Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621688›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices on the National Lung Cancer Screening Program: a qualitative study from Worimi and Awabakal country.

Tanika L Ridgeway Worimi, Kayden Roberts-Barker Wiradjuri, Kade Booth, Michelle Kennedy Wiradjuri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tanika L Ridgeway WorimiUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
Kayden Roberts-Barker WiradjuriUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
Kade BoothUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
Michelle Kennedy WiradjuriUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.ORCID 0000-0001-9691-068X

Funding

Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing #MRF2008603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo gather communities' perspectives on the upcoming National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP) to guide appropriate and equitable access and uptake.

designQualitative study using Yarning methods. SETTING,

participantsYarning circles were conducted with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people on Awabakal and Worimi country in December 2023.

resultsTwenty-nine Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people participated in Yarning circles held at three locations across Awabakal and Worimi country. Community participants felt that the need for equitable and culturally safe NLCSP pathways is critical, with the NLCSP implementation plan and associated guidelines requiring multiple modes of health promotion, flexible eligibility that is equitable, alternative referral pathways to overcome barriers to access, and screening pathways and processes that are culturally responsive and community led.

conclusionsThe NLCSP provides a timely opportunity to improve health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. To achieve this, it is essential that the NLCSP is tailored to the needs of each community in accessing preventive health care and upholds rights to self-determination.

Indexed as

Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesEarly Detection of CancerHealth Services, IndigenousLung NeoplasmsMass ScreeningAustraliaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research________________________________________________________________________Early detection of cancerMass screening

Identifiers

PMID40621688
PMCPMC12230919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.