ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025
What do Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory value during the operation journey? A qualitative study.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to Accessing Vascular Surgery in Northern, Rural, and Remote Canadian Communities.CJC open · 2026Review
- Decolonizing healthcare: the role of traditional medicine in building inclusive health systems for Cameroonian women.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the values of Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory during their perioperative journey.
designA community-based participatory action research approach was used, integrating yarning, deep listening and reflection methods to gather qualitative data in culturally appropriate ways. Data collection involved two yarning circles followed by interpretation and triangulation sessions with co-researchers.
settingConducted in non-health care settings in Garramilla (Darwin) between May 2023 and September 2024, the study included participants from urban, regional and remote NT Aboriginal communities.
participantsPurposive and snowball sampling were used to engage 18 participants with lived experience of surgery, who share expertise in renal health journeys and have kinship ties spanning from Saltwater Country to Desert Country, with diverse age, language and gender representation.
main outcome measuresThematic insights into what First Nations peoples in the NT value during the perioperative journey, to inform culturally safe models of care.
resultsRespect emerged as the core principle in the perioperative journey, with family involvement, cultural practices and effective communication identified as key elements. Respect was evident in honouring cultural protocols, integrating traditional healing practices and recognising patient autonomy. Family involvement was highlighted as essential, with kinship ties influencing shared decision-making processes and support throughout the perioperative experience. Culturally competent communication, including the use of interpreters and clear explanations, played a critical role in bridging cultural differences and ensuring shared understanding. Together, these elements fostered a sense of safety, belonging and empowerment. Ultimately, trust was identified as an overarching outcome that unified these interconnected values, enhancing patient comfort, engagement and overall satisfaction in the perioperative journey.
conclusionRespect is integral to Aboriginal people in the perioperative journey, and they value family, culture and communication when navigating surgery. When these values coalesce, trust is generated. These findings highlight the need to integrate culturally informed, patient-centred care models that prioritise respect and trust building to improve accessibility, experience and surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.