ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2025
Insights into motor impairment assessment using myographic signals with artificial intelligence: a scoping review.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated EMG-Based Classification of Upper Extremity Motor Impairment Levels in Subacute Stroke.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myographic signals can effectively detect and assess subtle changes in muscle function; however, their measurement and analysis are often limited in clinical settings compared to inertial measurement units. Recently, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has made the analysis of complex myographic signals more feasible. This scoping review aims to examine the use of myographic signals in conjunction with AI for assessing motor impairments and highlight potential limitations and future directions. We conducted a systematic search using specific keywords in the Scopus and PubMed databases. After a thorough screening process, 111 relevant studies were selected for review. These studies were organized based on target applications (measurement modality, measurement location, and AI application task), sample demographics (age, sex, ethnicity, and pathology), and AI models (general approach and algorithm type). Among various myographic measurement modalities, surface electromyography was the most commonly used. In terms of AI approaches, machine learning with feature engineering was the predominant method, with classification tasks being the most common application of AI. Our review also noted a significant bias in participant demographics, with a greater representation of males compared to females and healthy individuals compared to clinical populations. Overall, our findings suggest that integrating myographic signals with AI has the potential to provide more objective and clinically relevant assessments of motor impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.