ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Associations between unilateral-or-bilateral palatal impactions of permanent maxillary canines with dental morphologies, root anatomies, and alveolar measurements.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the associations between both unilateral/bilateral palatal impactions of the maxillary canine and a long list of various dentoalveolar anatomical measurements and parameters. Methods: This case-control study was performed on CBCTs of 3 groups of 23 subjects each (control, unilateral impaction, bilateral impaction, n = 138 hemimaxillae in 69 patients). Examined were the mesiodistal and buccolingual widths of the 1-6 teeth on the right and left sides, all their roots' lengths, maxillary arch widths on the axial plane at the basal bone and the alveolar bone levels, at the distances 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mm from the most anterior point, and maxillary arch circumferences. Moreover, primary canine retention was assessed as well. The groups were compared using chi-square, Results: Significant comparisons ( Conclusion: Several dentoalveolar variables were linked to canine impaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.