ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
The application effect of rubber band traction assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal precancerous lesions.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rubber band traction-assisted ESD (RBT-ESD) in treating esophageal precancerous lesions (EPLs). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included the clinical data of 110 patients with EPLs who received ESD from June 1, 2022 to November 10, 2024 at the Handan First Hospital. Of them, 55 patients who underwent RBT-ESD were matched with patients who underwent conventional ESD (C-ESD) using propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio. Surgical outcomes, one-time complete resection rate, quality of life (QOL), and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results: RBT-ESD was associated with considerably lower surgical time, intraoperative mucosal injection volume, submucosal dissection time, mucosal dissection speed, and postoperative hospital stay than C-ESD ( Conclusions: Compared with C-ESD, RBT-ESD for EPLs may optimize the effectiveness of the surgical treatment and enhance patients' QOL with comparable safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.