ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Scalp electrode placement accuracy for the canine electroencephalography array.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current knowledge of intermittent photic stimulation for electroencephalography in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Review
- A comparative analysis and critical review of two rTMS treatment durations in dogs with drug-resistant idiopathic epilepsy.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the common occurrence of idiopathic epilepsy amongst neurological conditions in dogs, electroencephalography (EEG), the gold standard for seizure detection, is relatively neglected. The use of EEG in veterinary medicine is rudimentary compared to that in human medicine, particularly with respect to the quantification of EEG electrode placement error, i.e., the accuracy of electrode placement relative to the diverse canine cortical topography. Methods: Therefore, we quantified the intra-observer EEG electrode placement error using a single canine EEG electrode placement array, on virtual models of head and brain created from archived computed tomographic scans of Brachycephalic ( Results: Gaps in cortical coverage between cohorts were identified, such as poor coverage of the olfactory and frontal regions in the brachycephalic cohort and the parietal region in the Mesocephalic and Dolichocephalic cohorts. Quantitative analysis of electrode placement in the Mesocephalic cohort showed the minimum variance of electrode localization for the x coordinate of the F8 electrode (0.8 mm) and the greatest variance for the y coordinate of the Cz electrode (35.2 mm). Discussion: This is the first study to highlight the knowledge gaps regarding the accuracy of canine EEG electrode localization, differences in the array coverage across the diverse canine skull conformations, and the urgent need for a stereotactic brain atlas for specific canine skull conformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.