ArticleLandscape ecology2025
Understanding the hydrological and landscape connectivity of lakes.
Article in Landscape ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Hydromorphological Pressures Co-govern Lake Water Quality in a Mediterranean Environment. A Study for Greek Natural Lakes and Reservoirs.Environmental management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Connectivity is a key property of water, enabling the flow of energy, material and individuals within and between sites. Climate and land use changes can profoundly modify connectivity, yet few studies have quantified the patterns in connectivity among lakes at national scales. Objectives: Our objectives were: i) to examine relationships between a broad range of lake connectivity metrics, ii) to evaluate how lake connectivity varies nationally, regionally and in relation to land cover. Methods: We calculated hundreds of metrics of freshwater connectivity for all lakes in Great Britain > 1 ha (n = 10,095), quantifying connectedness in their catchments and surrounding landscape. Patterns of metrics, as well as their correlations and inter-connectedness, were examined at multiple scales. Results: Strong correlations existed within groups of metrics for lake, pond and river connectivity. However, both pond and river metrics varied independently of lake metrics. The most and least urban river basin districts showed noticeable differences in metric correlation. Lake area, pond count and river length in catchments were selected as a core set of connectivity metrics, which explain most of the variation across national and regional scales. Conclusions: Connectivity metrics can be synthesised to core groups that are easily calculated and effectively account for lake, pond and river connectivity. From a landscape management perspective, hydrological connectivity was highest
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.