Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621451›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Toward understanding sexual immune dimorphism in humans.

Tomasz J Nowak, Michael P Muehlenbein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The neuroimmune-glutamate hypothesis of addiction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Early-life dentine-based elemental biodynamics and cord blood telomere length.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomasz J NowakLaboratory for Evolutionary Medicine and One Health, Department of Anthropology, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.
Michael P MuehlenbeinLaboratory for Evolutionary Medicine and One Health, Department of Anthropology, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual immune dimorphism refers to the distinct differences in immune responses between males and females, influenced by genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and behavioral factors. These differences, shaped by evolutionary pressures, manifest in varied susceptibilities to infectious and autoimmune diseases, as well as differences in vaccine responses and disease outcomes. Females generally exhibit stronger immune responses than males, which confer protection against infections but also lead to a higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases. Hormones such as estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone play pivotal roles in modulating these responses. Estrogen enhances immune activation, promoting inflammation and increasing autoimmune susceptibility, while testosterone exerts primarily immunosuppressive effects, reducing autoimmune risks but heightening infection susceptibility. Genetic factors, including X-linked immune-related genes and cellular mosaicism, further contribute to the observed dimorphism, as do epigenetic mechanisms that modulate immune gene expression. From an evolutionary perspective, life history theory explains these differences as the result of trade-offs between reproductive strategies and immune function, with females prioritizing robust immunity for offspring survival and males balancing immune investment with reproductive fitness. Behavioral factors, such as pathogen avoidance and risk-taking, add complexity to the dimorphism. This review adopts a narrative format intentionally designed to provide a cohesive conceptual synthesis of major mechanisms underlying sexual immune dimorphism. While acknowledging the complexity and breadth of this topic, we explicitly focus on integrating hormonal, genetic/epigenetic, behavioral, and evolutionary contexts. By examining the interplay of these factors, the review provides a foundation for understanding the biological underpinnings and evolutionary context of immune differences between sexes.

Indexed as

Immune SystemSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBiological EvolutionEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansMaleGonadal Steroid Hormonesestrogenimmune-endocrine interactionslife history theorypathogen avoidanceregulation of immunitysexual immune dimorphismtestosteroneX-chromosome inactivation

Identifiers

PMID40621451
PMCPMC12226279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.