Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621441›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2025

ACES-GNN: can graph neural network learn to explain activity cliffs?

Xu Chen, Dazhou Yu, Liang Zhao, Fang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xu ChenDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University Atlanta Georgia 30322 USA fang.liu@emory.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9573-221X
Dazhou YuDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University Atlanta Georgia 30322 USA.
Liang ZhaoDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University Atlanta Georgia 30322 USA.
Fang LiuDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University Atlanta Georgia 30322 USA fang.liu@emory.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1322-4997

Funding

Explainable and Ethical AI for Studying Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG089806 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES J LAH, Deqiang Qiu · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG089806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have revolutionized molecular property prediction by leveraging graph-based representations, yet their opaque decision-making processes hinder broader adoption in drug discovery. This study introduces the Activity-Cliff-Explanation-Supervised GNN (ACES-GNN) framework, designed to simultaneously improve predictive accuracy and interpretability by integrating explanation supervision for activity cliffs (ACs) into GNN training. ACs, defined by structurally similar molecules with significant potency differences, pose challenges for traditional models due to their reliance on shared structural features. By aligning model attributions with chemist-friendly interpretations, the ACES-GNN framework bridges the gap between prediction and explanation. Validated across 30 pharmacological targets, ACES-GNN consistently enhances both predictive accuracy and attribution quality for ACs compared to unsupervised GNNs. Our results demonstrate a positive correlation between improved predictions and accurate explanations, offering a robust and adaptable framework to better understand and interpret ACs. This work underscores the potential of explanation-guided learning to advance interpretable artificial intelligence in molecular modeling and drug discovery.

Identifiers

PMID40621441
PMCPMC12226972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.