ArticleRSC advances2025
Toward high sustainability using fully recycled geopolymer concrete: mechanical, rheological, and microstructural properties.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-scale mechanistic evaluation of reactivity balance in metakaolin-nano-CaCOScientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the sustainable production of fully recycled geopolymer concrete using waste ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete, aiming to reduce environmental impact and promote circular construction practices. Crushed OPC concrete was utilized as both recycled aggregate (RA) and recycled concrete powder (RCP), while recycled clay brick powder (RBP) was incorporated as a supplementary aluminosilicate additive. Alkaline activation was performed using sodium hydroxide solutions at three molarities (8, 12, and 16 M) combined with water glass (WG) at a WG/NaOH ratio of 2. The mechanical, rheological, and microstructural properties of geopolymer recycled concrete (GRC) and paste (GRP) were assessed alongside a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Results showed that incorporating RA and RCP significantly enhanced compressive strength-up to 90% at 90 days compared to geopolymer paste-while increasing NaOH molarity improved overall mechanical performance. Although RBP decreased compressive strength, density, and elastic modulus, it notably enhanced workability, surface quality, and crack resistance. Microstructural analysis revealed strong adhesion between RCP and RA due to their chemical compatibility, contributing to matrix homogeneity. The LCA confirmed that GRC exhibits a lower environmental footprint than conventional OPC concrete. These findings support the classification of GRC as a high-performance structural material and demonstrate its potential as a viable, eco-friendly alternative for sustainable construction applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.