Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621416›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2025

Toward high sustainability using fully recycled geopolymer concrete: mechanical, rheological, and microstructural properties.

Faramarz Moodi, Mohammad Reza Hanafi, Zahra Shariatinia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Faramarz MoodiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology Tehran Iran fmoodi@aut.ac.ir.
Mohammad Reza HanafiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology Tehran Iran fmoodi@aut.ac.ir.
Zahra ShariatiniaDepartment of Chemistry, Amirkabir University of Technology Tehran Iran shariati@aut.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-6563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the sustainable production of fully recycled geopolymer concrete using waste ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete, aiming to reduce environmental impact and promote circular construction practices. Crushed OPC concrete was utilized as both recycled aggregate (RA) and recycled concrete powder (RCP), while recycled clay brick powder (RBP) was incorporated as a supplementary aluminosilicate additive. Alkaline activation was performed using sodium hydroxide solutions at three molarities (8, 12, and 16 M) combined with water glass (WG) at a WG/NaOH ratio of 2. The mechanical, rheological, and microstructural properties of geopolymer recycled concrete (GRC) and paste (GRP) were assessed alongside a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Results showed that incorporating RA and RCP significantly enhanced compressive strength-up to 90% at 90 days compared to geopolymer paste-while increasing NaOH molarity improved overall mechanical performance. Although RBP decreased compressive strength, density, and elastic modulus, it notably enhanced workability, surface quality, and crack resistance. Microstructural analysis revealed strong adhesion between RCP and RA due to their chemical compatibility, contributing to matrix homogeneity. The LCA confirmed that GRC exhibits a lower environmental footprint than conventional OPC concrete. These findings support the classification of GRC as a high-performance structural material and demonstrate its potential as a viable, eco-friendly alternative for sustainable construction applications.

Identifiers

PMID40621416
PMCPMC12226849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.