ArticleCureus2025
A Rare Presentation of Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage Following a Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Idiopathic retroperitoneal hematoma after normal vaginal delivery: a case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Massive Retroperitoneal Hematoma Following Vaginal Delivery: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Cureus · 2026Article
- Postpartum retroperitoneal hematoma secondary to ovarian artery rupture: A case presentation.Turkish journal of emergency medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage is a rare but potentially fatal condition characterized by bleeding into the retroperitoneal space, located behind the abdominal cavity. In postpartum women, case reports are the primary source of information regarding this rare presentation, which typically arises from uterine artery lacerations, uterine rupture, extension of vaginal hematomas, or, in extremely rare instances, the rupture of ovarian artery aneurysms. Diagnosing a retroperitoneal hemorrhage can be particularly challenging due to its concealed location and the nonspecific nature of its symptoms, often leading to delayed recognition. The management of such bleeds presents additional difficulties, given that surgical access to the retroperitoneal space is complex, and the bleeding may spontaneously tamponade over time. Furthermore, current knowledge of retroperitoneal hemorrhage management is largely based on cases secondary to trauma, which are more common. This knowledge may not always be directly applicable to postpartum spontaneous hemorrhages, making the management of this condition even more complex. As such, it is crucial to document and report these cases to enhance our understanding of postpartum spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhages. By doing so, we aim to improve early detection and refine management strategies, ultimately reducing maternal morbidity and mortality associated with this condition. This case describes a 32-year-old woman who presented two days after a spontaneous vaginal birth with a large retroperitoneal bleed secondary to a ruptured ovarian artery aneurysm. She arrived at a rural emergency department in hemorrhagic shock, with a CT scan confirming retroperitoneal bleeding. The patient was urgently transferred to a tertiary center, where exploratory laparotomy was considered. However, she was successfully managed with gelfoam angioembolization and closely monitored with serial imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.