ArticleCureus2025
Deep Learning-Based Classification System for Facial Pigmented Lesions to Aid Laser Treatment Decisions.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate diagnosis of facial pigmented lesions is essential for selecting appropriate treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. Deep learning algorithms, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown promise in classifying skin lesions but have been underutilized in differentiating facial pigmented lesions, particularly in the context of laser treatment planning. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate deep learning models using transfer learning to differentiate among five types of facial pigmented lesions and compare their diagnostic accuracy with that of expert and non-expert dermatologists. A dataset comprising 432 high-resolution clinical images of five facial pigmented lesions, melasma, ephelides, acquired dermal melanocytosis (ADM), solar lentigo, and lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma (LM/LMM), was collected. Images underwent preprocessing, including white balance correction and region of interest (ROI) extraction. Two CNN architectures, InceptionResNetV2 and DenseNet121, were trained using transfer learning. The models' diagnostic accuracies were compared with those of nine board-certified dermatologists (experts) and 11 noncertified dermatologists (non-experts). The InceptionResNetV2 and DenseNet121 models achieved overall diagnostic accuracies of 87% and 86%, respectively. Both models outperformed expert dermatologists, who had a median diagnostic accuracy of 80%, and non-expert dermatologists, who had a median accuracy of 63%. Notably, both models achieved 100% sensitivity in identifying LM/LMM. The developed deep learning models demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to dermatologists in differentiating among facial pigmented lesions. These findings suggest that such models have potential clinical applicability in assisting dermatological diagnosis and guiding appropriate treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.