Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621347›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Deep Learning-Based Classification System for Facial Pigmented Lesions to Aid Laser Treatment Decisions.

Haruyo Yamamoto, Chisa Nakashima, Kenichiro Kasai, Hiroyuki Irie, Hitonari Kanetomo, Shigeto Yanagihara, Sanae Miyake, Keiko Watanabe, Sayuri Sato, Hisashi Uhara and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haruyo YamamotoDepartment of Dermatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, JPN.
Chisa NakashimaDepartment of Dermatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, JPN.
Kenichiro KasaiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Kasai Clinic for Plastic Surgery, Osaka, JPN.
Hiroyuki IrieDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, JPN.
Hitonari KanetomoDepartment of Dermatology, Kanetomo Dermatology Clinic, Osaka, JPN.
Shigeto YanagiharaDepartment of Dermatology, Kanetomo Dermatology Clinic, Osaka, JPN.
Sanae MiyakeDepartment of Dermatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, JPN.
Keiko WatanabeDepartment of Dermatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, JPN.
Sayuri SatoDepartment of Dermatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, JPN.
Hisashi UharaDepartment of Dermatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, JPN.
Fumiaki TakedaDepartment of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Kindai University, Higashihiroshima, JPN.
Atsushi OtsukaDepartment of Dermatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate diagnosis of facial pigmented lesions is essential for selecting appropriate treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. Deep learning algorithms, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown promise in classifying skin lesions but have been underutilized in differentiating facial pigmented lesions, particularly in the context of laser treatment planning. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate deep learning models using transfer learning to differentiate among five types of facial pigmented lesions and compare their diagnostic accuracy with that of expert and non-expert dermatologists. A dataset comprising 432 high-resolution clinical images of five facial pigmented lesions, melasma, ephelides, acquired dermal melanocytosis (ADM), solar lentigo, and lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma (LM/LMM), was collected. Images underwent preprocessing, including white balance correction and region of interest (ROI) extraction. Two CNN architectures, InceptionResNetV2 and DenseNet121, were trained using transfer learning. The models' diagnostic accuracies were compared with those of nine board-certified dermatologists (experts) and 11 noncertified dermatologists (non-experts). The InceptionResNetV2 and DenseNet121 models achieved overall diagnostic accuracies of 87% and 86%, respectively. Both models outperformed expert dermatologists, who had a median diagnostic accuracy of 80%, and non-expert dermatologists, who had a median accuracy of 63%. Notably, both models achieved 100% sensitivity in identifying LM/LMM. The developed deep learning models demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to dermatologists in differentiating among facial pigmented lesions. These findings suggest that such models have potential clinical applicability in assisting dermatological diagnosis and guiding appropriate treatment strategies.

Indexed as

acquired dermal melanocytosisconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdensenet121dermatological diagnosisephelidesfacial pigmented lesionsinceptionresnetv2melasmasolar lentigo

Identifiers

PMID40621347
PMCPMC12228559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.