Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621327›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Differentiating Metastatic From Non-metastatic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Carcinoma.

Vamsi Venkat, Anil K Sakalecha, Anees Dudekula, Mahima Kale R, Guru Yogendra Muthyal, Kalyani R

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. PET-CT radiomics and artificial intelligence for predicting lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vamsi VenkatDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, IND.
Anil K SakalechaDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, IND.
Anees DudekulaDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, IND.
Mahima Kale RDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, IND.
Guru Yogendra MuthyalDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, IND.
Kalyani RDepartment of Pathology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn cervical carcinoma, lymph node involvement is a key indicator of disease progression and a critical prognostic factor that influences staging and treatment. Accurate identification of metastatic lymph nodes is essential for optimal management. Diffusion-weighted MRI combined with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping provides a non-invasive approach for evaluating tissue cellularity and may enhance the identification of metastatic lymph nodes, surpassing traditional size-based criteria. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to assess the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and ADC values in differentiating between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. The study focuses on imaging findings without histopathological confirmation, aiming to determine whether ADC measurements can reliably indicate nodal metastasis.

methodsThirty patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB to IIIC) were prospectively enrolled in a study with a duration of three months. All patients underwent pre-treatment pelvic MRI including DWI on a 1.5 T scanner (b-values: 50, 400, and 800 s/mm²). ADC maps were obtained, and the ADC values of lymph nodes were quantitatively analyzed. Lymph nodes were categorized as suspicious for metastasis based on MRI features, including a short-axis diameter of ≥10 mm, round shape, or the presence of necrosis. Nodes lacking these characteristics were considered benign. Histopathological confirmation of lymph nodes was not conducted. A sample size of 30 was calculated via Fisher's z-test formula for correlation (assuming r = 0.685, 99% confidence, 90% power).

resultsOf 30 patients (mean age -63.5 years, range 51-80), one-third had radiologic evidence of lymph node involvement on MRI (stage IIIC1 by the FIGO 2018 criteria), while the remainder had no enlarged nodes. DWI showed qualitatively restricted diffusion in nodes suspected of metastasis. Quantitatively, ADC values were markedly lower in suspicious (metastatic-appearing) nodes compared to non-suspicious nodes. The mean ADC of nodes deemed metastatic was approximately 0.90 × 10

conclusionDWI and ADC mapping demonstrated strong potential in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma patients. Metastatic nodes showed significantly lower ADC values (around or below 1.0 × 10

Indexed as

adc valuesapparent diffusion coefficientcervical cancerdiffusion-weighted mridwilymph node metastasismetastatic lymph nodesmri lymph node assessmentnon-invasive imaging

Identifiers

PMID40621327
PMCPMC12229221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.