Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621323›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies in Alzheimer's Disease.

Umesh C Chundu, Sree Ram Thiriveedhi, Chetanya Bhatti, Jaya Sai Mupparaju, Nina Otinashvili, Elene Gelishvili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Umesh C ChunduNeurology, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, IND.
Sree Ram ThiriveedhiCommunity Medicine, Katuri Medical College and Hospital, Guntur, IND.
Chetanya BhattiFamily Medicine, Navjeevan Hospital Hisar, New Delhi, IND.
Jaya Sai MupparajuInternal Medicine, NRI Medical College, Vijayawada, IND.
Nina OtinashviliMedicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, GEO.
Elene GelishviliMedicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, GEO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies targeting amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques have gained prominence over the past decade as potential disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD), leading to major regulatory approvals and global debate. Nonetheless, the central question persists: does this emerging therapy have a justified role in the treatment protocol for AD? This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of these agents across phase II and III clinical trials conducted in the past decade (2014-2024), aligning with the timeline when disease-modifying therapies gained momentum. A systematic search was performed across PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted between January 2014 and December 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on studies that evaluated cognitive outcomes using scales such as the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Additionally, trials assessing biomarkers, including CSF measures and PET imaging, were included. Safety outcomes, particularly amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), were also systematically analyzed. Due to heterogeneity in outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Sixteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Lecanemab reduced amyloid burden with 81% of patients achieving amyloid-negative PET scans (Clarity AD trial) and showed a 27% reduction in cognitive decline on the ADCOMS scale. While statistically significant, the 27% ADCOMS (Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score) reduction warrants comparison to MCID (minimal clinically important difference) thresholds (e.g., ~0.5-1.0 points for CDR-SB in early AD) to assess real-world impact. Donanemab demonstrated 76% plaque clearance and a 35% slowing in cognitive decline in early AD patients. Aducanumab showed dose-dependent effects on plaque clearance but had inconsistent cognitive outcomes and higher ARIA rates. Recent mAb trials provide promising evidence for disease modification in early AD stages, particularly with lecanemab and donanemab. However, variability in cognitive outcomes and safety concerns warrant cautious interpretation and long-term validation.

Indexed as

alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid beta proteinamyloid-related imaging abnormalitiesanti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodiescognition disorders

Identifiers

PMID40621323
PMCPMC12227895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.