Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621314›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Know the Anatomy of Your Intrauterine Device: A Case of Hormonal Sleeve Displacement Resulting in Concerns Over Foreign Body Loss.

Weerawaroon Mavichak, Mohammed Al Kharfan, Brendan Gallagher

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weerawaroon MavichakObstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, GBR.
Mohammed Al KharfanObstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, GBR.
Brendan GallagherObstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most commonly used forms of long-term reversible contraception and are also used for treating gynaecological conditions such as dysmenorrhea, endometrial hyperplasia, and abnormal uterine bleeding. While IUDs have a high safety profile, complications may occur during insertion, use, and removal. IUD fragmentation is a rare but potential complication, in which patients may be subjected to invasive management. We describe a 52-year-old female patient who, after having her levonorgestrel IUD removed, was mistakenly believed to have IUD remnants in her uterus. The removed device was found to be bilaterally armless, subjecting her to hysteroscopy. In her previous removal, the same phenomenon occurred, leading to a pelvic X-ray. It was discovered that the device's hormonal sheath slid over both arms upon removal, most likely due to a narrowed cervical canal, giving the false appearance of an elongated armless device. To our knowledge, there has been no reported literature on this occurrence apart from being described in the United Kingdom's Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Guideline on Intrauterine Contraception.

Indexed as

female sexual healthgynehormonal contraceptionlong acting contraceptionmirena

Identifiers

PMID40621314
PMCPMC12228953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.