ArticleCureus2025
Know the Anatomy of Your Intrauterine Device: A Case of Hormonal Sleeve Displacement Resulting in Concerns Over Foreign Body Loss.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most commonly used forms of long-term reversible contraception and are also used for treating gynaecological conditions such as dysmenorrhea, endometrial hyperplasia, and abnormal uterine bleeding. While IUDs have a high safety profile, complications may occur during insertion, use, and removal. IUD fragmentation is a rare but potential complication, in which patients may be subjected to invasive management. We describe a 52-year-old female patient who, after having her levonorgestrel IUD removed, was mistakenly believed to have IUD remnants in her uterus. The removed device was found to be bilaterally armless, subjecting her to hysteroscopy. In her previous removal, the same phenomenon occurred, leading to a pelvic X-ray. It was discovered that the device's hormonal sheath slid over both arms upon removal, most likely due to a narrowed cervical canal, giving the false appearance of an elongated armless device. To our knowledge, there has been no reported literature on this occurrence apart from being described in the United Kingdom's Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Guideline on Intrauterine Contraception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.