Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621305›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Solitary Melanoma Lesion in a Pulmonary Nodule: A Case Report.

Gabrielle Aluisio, Grace Ralston, Gene Saylors

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabrielle AluisioMedicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Spartanburg, USA.
Grace RalstonMedicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Spartanburg, USA.
Gene SaylorsOncology, Bon Secours St. Francis Hospital, Charleston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most melanomas in the respiratory system present as metastatic tumors, with primary lung melanoma nodules being incredibly rare. Melanoma metastasis to the lung is often the first clinically apparent site of visceral metastasis. Any pulmonary lesion confirmed to be melanoma must be assumed to represent metastatic disease until proven otherwise, since it is much more common than a primary lesion. This case describes a 63-year-old female with an incidental 12 x 11 mm nodule found on chest computed tomography (CT) in the upper lobe of the left lung. This nodule appeared to be new, as evidenced by a previous cardiac CT performed one year prior that should have had the nodule in the field of view. Positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) demonstrated a fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid solid left upper lobe nodule with no evidence of regional lymph node involvement or distant metastatic disease, concluding the nodule was most consistent with a primary pulmonary neoplasm. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain confirmed no evidence of brain metastatic disease. CT-guided fine-needle biopsy was performed, with histology consistent with malignant melanoma. The tumor board agreed that, despite the lack of evidence of melanoma on skin exam, fundus exam, or imaging of distant sites, the patient's melanoma should be treated as metastatic melanoma of unknown primary site (cTx, cN0, cM1b, stage IV). Treatment with nivolumab-relatlimab 280 mg intravenously every 28 days was initiated, with a significant treatment response within two infusions. This case report discusses the diagnosis and approach to a solitary lung melanoma suspicious for primary pulmonary malignant melanoma, with no clear evidence of metastasis, with current therapeutic guidelines for metastatic melanoma cases.

Indexed as

melanomametastatic melanomanivolumab-relatlimabprimary malignant melanoma of the lung (pmml)solitary pulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID40621305
PMCPMC12229246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.