ArticleCureus2025
Utilizing AI-Powered Thematic Analysis: Methodology, Implementation, and Lessons Learned.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online clinical readiness course enhanced knowledge and perceived confidence of trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Prompt injection of OpenAI custom GPTs leaks informatics secrets.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Parent Perspectives on Dietary and Nutraceutical Therapies in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis Using a Large Language Model.Journal of restorative medicine · 2026Article
- Open-access RUSH protocol course improves knowledge and perceived confidence among healthcare learners.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Medical Education (2013-2024): A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform healthcare, medical education, and research. Large language models (LLMs) have gained attention for their ability to improve qualitative research by automating data analysis, coding, and thematic interpretation. While prior research evaluates LLMs' performance in qualitative studies, clear guidelines on their implementation remain scarce. This manuscript offers detailed methods with instructions and prompts for using LLMs in qualitative analysis. It provides a clear, step-by-step, practical approach. We developed a customized generative pre-trained transformer (Custom-GPT) based on Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis framework. The performance of the model was evaluated across three datasets, comparing its outputs with manually generated codes and themes. Triangulation was conducted using Google's NotebookLM. Across the three datasets, the model generated consistent thematic structures that aligned closely with manual coding. However, slight variability in responses, lack of AI decision-making explanations, and requiring repeated prompting during the process were the main challenges. Additional human interventions were required between steps to refine outputs and ensure methodological integrity. LLMs offer promising opportunities to enhance qualitative thematic analysis. However, their limitations emphasize the necessity of human oversight throughout the process. This report highlights the importance of integrating AI tools responsibly, emphasizing methodological rigor, and developing clear guidelines for AI-assisted qualitative research. Future research should explore ethical frameworks, domain-specific LLMs, and advanced prompt engineering techniques to optimize AI's role in qualitative analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.