ArticleCureus2025
Low Visual Acuity Among Children in Public Schools in the Northeast of Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study describes the prevalence of low visual acuity (LVA) in public school students from a city in the interior of the Northeast region of Brazil. Methods This was an observational, cross-sectional, exploratory study. The sample consisted of schoolchildren from the second to the fourth grade of five public schools in Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil. Data collection was carried out in the schools themselves, with a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire applied and visual acuity (VA) measured using the Snellen "E" optotype chart. LVA was defined as uncorrected VA < 20/25 in at least one eye. Results The sample consisted of 358 children, with a median age of nine (IQR 8-10) years, of which 189 (52.9%) were female, and 169 (47.2%) were male. A total of 248 (69.3%) individuals had never been to an ophthalmologist. LVA was found in 105 (29.3%) schoolchildren, and of these, 7.6% (8/105) currently used glasses. Factors associated with LVA were female gender and white ethnicity. LVA was evidenced in 60 (31.7%) schoolchildren with excessive screen use and in 35 (25.5%) without excessive use (OR 1.35; 95% CI 0.83-2.19, p = 0.222), and excessive screen use was associated with visual signs/symptoms such as tearing and eye itching. Conclusion LVA was observed in approximately 30% (n = 105) of children in public schools in the interior of Bahia, and less than 10% of these children used glasses. Our study reinforces the importance of visual screening of schoolchildren through active search in our region and the creation of strategies to facilitate access to ophthalmological consultations and glasses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.