Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621245›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Evolution of Do-It-Yourself Brain Hacking: From Fringe to Frontier.

Shaheen E Lakhan

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shaheen E LakhanMedical Office, Click Therapeutics, Inc., New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Do-it-yourself (DIY) brain hacking has evolved from fringe experimentation to a cultural and clinical phenomenon reshaping how individuals interact with their brains. From early self-directed use of racetam nootropics, at-home transcranial direct current stimulation, and meditation apps, to the normalization of microdosing psychedelics, this movement reflects a broader shift toward brain self-optimization. What began as grassroots experimentation now informs regulated interventions. For example, consumer-grade cognitive training tools and neurofeedback devices have inspired FDA-cleared prescription digital therapeutics for conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, and migraine. Similarly, informal mood tracking and exposure-based journaling practices have evolved into structured cognitive behavioral therapy apps and biosensor-informed just-in-time adaptive interventions. This editorial traces the trajectory of DIY brain hacking across three phases (experimental enthusiasts, consumer biohackers, and clinical convergence) and argues that medicine must shift from skepticism to stewardship. As programmable cognition becomes a clinical reality, and drawing on parallels with other organ systems, guiding this transformation with evidence and ethics is essential to safeguard patient autonomy, efficacy, and safety.

Indexed as

biohackingbrain hackingcognitive optimizationdigital therapeuticsmicrodosingneuroenhancementneurotechnologynootropicsprogrammable cognitiontranscranial stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40621245
PMCPMC12228941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.