ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Deep learning-based electroencephalic decoding of the phase-lagged transcranial alternating current stimulation.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Domain Feature Fusion and Channel Attention in an Inception-Based Architecture for Motor Imagery EEG Decoding.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring the Effects of tACS Duration on Resting-State EEG: An Exploratory Within-Subject Study in Healthy Volunteers.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Closed-loop neuromodulation: a paradigm shift in precision neuroscience for clinical and cognitive applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated whether the phase-lag types of cross-frequency coupled alternating current stimulation (CFC-tACS), a non-invasive technique aimed at enhancing cognitive functions, could be decoded using task-based electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. EEG recordings were obtained from 21 healthy individuals engaged in a modified Sternberg task. CFC-tACS was administered online for 6 s during the middle of the retention period with either a 45° or 180° phase lag between the central executive network and the default mode network. To decode different phase-lag tACS conditions, we trained a modified EEGNet using task-based EEG signals before and after the online tACS application. When utilizing parietal EEG signals, the model achieved a decoding accuracy of 81.73%. Feature maps predominantly displayed EEG beta activity in the parietal region, suggesting that the model heavily weighted the beta band, indicative of top-down cognitive control influenced by tACS phase-lag type. Thus, EEG signals can decode online stimulation types, and task-related EEG spectral characteristics may indicate neuromodulatory activity during brain stimulation. This study could advance communicative strategies in brain-machine interfacing (BMI)-neuromodulation within a closed-loop system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.