ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for perioperative stroke prediction in noncardiac, nonvascular, and nonneurosurgical patients.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Perioperative stroke is a rare but severe complication that significantly impacts postoperative recovery and survival. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based predictive model for perioperative stroke risk in patients undergoing noncardiac, nonvascular, and nonneurosurgical procedures. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records from 106,328 patients at Henan Provincial People's Hospital, with data from 2,986 patients analyzed. Nine machine learning models were developed to predict perioperative stroke risk, incorporating key variables such as age, history of stroke, comorbidities, surgical factors, and intraoperative data. The models' performance was evaluated using standard metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Results: Among the nine models, the gradient boosting machine (GBM) demonstrated the best performance. In the training set, GBM achieved an AUC of 0.966 (95% CI: 0.957-0.975), with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and an F1 score of 90.4%, 90.4%, 81.8%, and 79.0%, respectively. In the validation set, the model maintained strong performance, with an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI: 0.917-0.954), accuracy of 82.6%, sensitivity of 88.8%, specificity of 81.0%, and an F1 score of 67.1%. In comparison, other models, such as logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and neural networks, exhibited lower AUC and less favorable performance metrics. Overall, GBM outperformed all models, demonstrating the best balance across accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Conclusion: The GBM model demonstrated strong predictive performance and generalizability for perioperative stroke risk in noncardiac, nonvascular, and nonneurosurgical patients. The integration of this model into a real-time clinical decision support system enhances clinical decision-making by enabling the early identification of high-risk patients and facilitating personalized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.