ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-precision endoscopic optical coherence elastography with a miniaturized catheter for in vivo assessment of endometrial injury.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Animal models of benign airway stenosis: Advances in construction techniques, evaluation systems, and perspectives.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Awake Tracheostomy in the Sitting Position for a Predicted Difficult Airway in Ankylosing Spondylitis With Inhalation Injury: A Case Report.Case reports in anesthesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Inhalation injury, a critical complication in patients with severe burns, contributes substantially to morbidity and mortality. Current diagnostic practices suffer from subjectivity and lack quantitative metrics. Enhanced diagnostic accuracy is imperative for improving treatment outcomes. Aim: Our objective was to develop normalized cross-sectional compliance (nCsC) of the airway wall, as measured by anatomical optical coherence tomography (aOCT), to reflect the severity of trachea inhalation injury. Approach: We employed a customized aOCT system that incorporates an intraluminal pressure probe to assess nCsC Results: We revealed that airway wall nCsC decreased initially after injury but exhibited recovery at 4 h. This is supported by ANOVA results showing that nCsC was significantly influenced by time ( Conclusions: Airway wall nCsC is a promising quantitative metric for assessing inhalation injury. Future translation of this aOCT-based technology to humans may potentially enhance clinical management of inhalation injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.