ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Nanohybrid Resin Occlusal Veneers Based on Bonding Surface: Enamel vs. Enamel-Dentin vs. Enamel-Resin Coating.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use and misuse of ANOVA in in vitro biomaterials studies: A methodological analysis of the last ten years in the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Mechanical Performance of 3D-Printed Resins versus CAD/CAM PMMA for Provisional Crowns: New Evidence under Simulated Clinical Conditions.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Fracture Resistance, Marginal Gap and Internal Gap of Lithium Disilicate Occlusal Veneers with Two Preparation Designs.Frontiers in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occlusal veneers provide an effective alternative for treating severe tooth wear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the bonding surface on the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM nanohybrid resin occlusal veneers with different thicknesses. Material and Methods: A total of 62 occlusal veneers were fabricated for first premolars. The specimens were divided into two groups of 36 based on the thickness of the veneers, (1.0 mm and 1.5 mm). Each group was further subdivided according to the bonding surface, categorized as enamel, enamel-dentin, and enamel-resin coating. The fracture resistance of the veneers was evaluated by applying a constant load at a speed of 1 mm/min using a universal testing maching. After fracture of the samples, they were analyzed using a stereomicroscope. Student's t-test was employed to compare fracture resistance in relation to thickness and bonding surface. Addionally, two-way ANOVA was used to assess the interaction between the variables. The significance level was set to 5%. Results: The 1.5 mm occlusal veneers exhibited significantly higher fracture resistance compared to the 1.0 mm veneers ( Conclusions: Fracture resistance was highest in CAD/CAM nanohybrid resin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and resin coatings. Likewise, restorations with a thickness of 1.5 mm showed significantly higher values across all three groups evaluated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.