ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
A comparative evaluation between cheiloscopic patterns and canine relationship in permanent dentition.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The precise determination of occlusal relationships, particularly the alignment of maxillary and mandibular canines, is fundamental to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Cheiloscopy, the study of lip print patterns, has gained prominence in forensic odontology and is hypothesized to have potential relevance in orthodontics. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between cheiloscopic patterns and canine relationships in permanent dentition to assess its diagnostic significance. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 300 adolescents (aged 14-16 years) from Chennai. Canine relationships were classified as Class I, Class II, or Class III based on standard intraoral examination protocols. Lip prints were collected using the lipstick-cellophane transfer technique and analyzed based on the Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classification system. Statistical analysis, including the Chi-Square test and Fisher's Exact Test, was performed using SPSS software (version 22.0), with a significance threshold of Results: Type II (branched) lip prints were the most prevalent across all canine relationships (71.3%), followed by Type IV (reticular) (17.7%). A significant gender-based difference was observed in Class III canine relationships (p = 0.003), where males predominantly exhibited Type II patterns (86.7%), while females showed a higher frequency of Type IV patterns (36.4%). No significant gender differences were noted in Class I and Class II relationships. Conclusions: Cheiloscopic patterns demonstrate notable variations across different canine relationships, with significant gender-based differences in Class III relationships. These findings suggest that cheiloscopy may serve as a non-invasive adjunct in orthodontic diagnosis and forensic odontology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.