ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Bioceramic dressing and its influence on intratubular penetration and bond strength of endodontic sealers.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of bioceramic root canal dressing (BRCD) BIO-C TEMP (BT) on intratubular penetrability through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and bond strength (push out) of epoxy resin AH Plus (AH) and bioceramic Bio-C (BC) sealers and evaluate the dentin surface after removing the intracanal medication by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Material and Methods: After biomechanical preparation, 48 bovine incisors were filled and evaluated for bond strength and intratubular penetrability. The groups were established by the type of sealer used: AH (n=24) or BC (n=24) and no use (0BT) (n=8) or use of root canal dressing for two different experimental times, 7 (7BT) (n=8) and 30 (30BT) (n=8) days. For SEM evaluation, five unfilled teeth were used: without BT (n=1), BT for 7 (n=2) and 30 (n=2) days. Kruskal-Wallis and T-tests were performed for bond strength analysis. Descriptive analysis was used in CLSM and SEM evaluations. Results: BT decreased the bond strength of AH and BC sealers in both experimental times (7 and 30 days) ( Conclusions: It is not possible to remove a BRCD completely from the root canal. A bioceramic root canal dressing Bio-C Temp decreased the bond strength of both tested sealers, epoxy resin AH Plus and bioceramic Bio-C Sealer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.