ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Gelatin methacryloyl advances in regenerative dentistry: A global bibliometric analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modern Drug Delivery Platforms Based on Photocrosslinkable Hydrogels (PCHs) in Dentistry: From Material Characteristics to Clinical Applications-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to comprehensively appraise the bibliometric features of articles evaluating the utilization of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) in dentistry by conducting a bibliographic search on the Web of Science databases until January 2025. Material and Methods: The following data were gathered: number and density of citations; authors; year, journal of publication and impact factor; study design and theme; keywords; institution and country of origin. The collaborative network was identified with the VOSviewer software and used to generate collaborative network maps for authors and keywords. Results: A total of 133 articles reporting the use of GelMA in dentistry were included. The articles were published between 2014 and 2025, and the most prevalent journals were Dental Materials (10,17% and 276 citations) and Acta Biomaterialia (10,1% and 208 citations) The most frequent study designs and themes were laboratory-based in vitro studies (58,6%) and endodontics (37,6%), respectively. Bottino MC (9%; 464 citations) and Dubey N (4,5%; 345 citations) were the most prominent authors in the list. Most articles originated from China (52,6%) and the United States (29,3%). University of Michigan (12,8%) and Sichuan University (6,7%), located in the USA and China, respectively, were the institutions with the most articles. There was a strong negative correlation between the number of citations and the year of publication, with the most recent articles being the most cited. Conclusions: Global articles related to the use of GelMA in dentistry were published mainly in China, with laboratory-based studies conducted in vitro addressing topics related to the use of GelMA in endodontics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.