ArticleGHM open2025
From prototype to implementation: Development of the DMIST scoring system for monitoring diabetic foot ulcers.
Article in GHM open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a significant health challenge, marked by high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Effective evaluation of the DFU healing process is crucial to prevent delays and enhance patient outcomes. Traditional wound healing scales like PUSH and DESIGN have proven suboptimal for DFUs, necessitating a disease-specific approach. This communication introduces a qualitative study, which served as the first step in developing the DMIST scale, a tool to monitor and assess DFUs over time. Using a morpho-qualitative analysis method, we examined 50 DFUs in 42 patients from a hospital in Tokyo, classifying ulcers by primary pathogenic factors and healing periods. Our analysis identified 8 categories and 33 sub-categories of morphological characteristics. Key findings included identification of features such as the "red ring", "hyperkeratosis", and "rolled wound edges", each affecting healing times. The DMIST scale integrates these visual signs, offering a practical tool for DFU management, particularly valuable in low-resource settings. This scale has undergone validation and refinement through international collaboration, with the aim to improve DFU patient outcomes globally. We hope the DMIST scale to be widely adapted and that our experience in its development will aid future development of wound assessment tools from various causes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.