ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Hybrid simulation of breast CT for assessing microcalcification detectability.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introduction to the JMI Special Issue on Advances in Breast Imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Approximating the ideal observer for joint signal detection and estimation tasks by the use of Markov-Chain Monte Carlo with generative adversarial networks.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Virtual imaging trials (VITs) are of interest for regulatory evaluation because they enable faster and more cost-effective evaluation of new imaging technologies than patient clinical trials. Our purpose is to develop a hybrid VIT methodology for breast computed tomography (CT) applications and use it to investigate microcalcification detectability. Approach: Ray tracing was used to generate projection images of clusters of five microcalcifications which varied in diameter, chemical composition, and density. These simulated projection images were added to patient projection images acquired with the fourth-generation breast CT scanner from UC Davis (Doheny) and reconstructed using the Feldkamp filtered backprojection algorithm with varying apodization kernels. Volumes of interest and maximum intensity projections were extracted from the reconstructed volumes. Human observers (HOs) and deep learning model observers (DLMOs) were used to detect calcification clusters, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to analyze detection performance. Results: DLMO detected 0.18-mm type I calcifications with AUC = 0.80 and 0.21 mm calcifications with Conclusions: A hybrid approach for virtual imaging trials shows promise for the assessment of imaging systems across a broad range of parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.