ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Insights into gait performance in Parkinson's disease via latent features of deep graph neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bio-Inspired Deep Learning for Parkinson's Disease Detection: A Comparative Study Based on Vocal Biomarkers and Archimedean Spiral Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- RecovGait: Occluded Parkinson's Disease Gait Reconstruction Using Unscented Tracking with Gated Initialization Technique.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introdcution: Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily impacts motor function and is prevalent among older adults worldwide. Gait performance (such as speed, stride, step, and so on) has been shown to play a significant role in diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. Fortunately, advancements in computer science have provided serial ways to calculate gait-related parameters, offering a more accurate alternative to the complex and often imprecise assessments traditionally relied upon by trained professionals. However, most of the current methods depend on data preprocessing and feature engineering, often require domain knowledge and laborious human involvement, and require additional manual adjustments when dealing with new tasks. Methods: To reduce the model's reliance on data preprocessing, feature engineering, and traversal rules, we employed the Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks (ST-GCN) model. We also defined five distinct states within a complete gait cycle: standstill (S), left swing (L), double support (D), right swing (R), and turnaround (T). Using ST-GCN, we extracted spatial and temporal patterns from these five states directly from the data, thereby enhancing the accuracy of gait parameter calculation. Furthermore, to improve the interpretability of the ST-GCN model and increase its clinical relevance, we trained the model on data from both healthy individuals and PD patients. This allowed us to explore how the model's parameters (different ST-GCN Layers) could assist clinicians in understanding. Results: The dataset used to evaluate the model in this paper includes motion data from 65 PD participants and 77 healthy control participants. Regarding the classification results from the 5 classifiers, ST-GCN achieved an average precision, recall, and F1-score of 93.48%, 93.21%, and 93.32%, outperforming both the Transformer-based and LSTM-based methods. Displaying the joints and edge weights from various layers of the ST-GCN, particularly when comparing data from healthy individuals and PD patients, enhances the model's feasibility and offers greater interpretability. This approach is more informative than relying on a purely black-box model. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the ST-GCN approach can effectively support accurate gait parameter assessment, assisting medical professionals in making diagnoses and reasonable rehabilitation plans for patients with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.