Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40621053›Full record

Reviewnpj biological physics and mechanics2025

Mechanobiology in the eye.

C Ross Ethier, Samuel Herberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj biological physics and mechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C Ross EthierWallace H. Coulter Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA.
Samuel HerbergDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY USA.

Funding

Role of cellular memory in glaucoma.R01EY034096 · NEI · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI Samuel Herberg · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
TM/SC-interface-on-a-chip for mechanistic studies of outflow regulation.R21EY036189 · NEI · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI HERBERG, SAMUEL · 2024 to 2025
$439k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034096NEI NIH HHS R21 EY036189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eye presents a very dynamic biomechanical environment, and thus ocular cells must be highly mechanosensitive and mechanoresponsive. Moreover, defects in mechanobiological pathways contribute to a number of sight-threatening ocular diseases, highlighting the importance of ocular mechanobiology. We here give a concise overview of the mechanobiology of ocular cells in the lens and cornea (and how mechanobiology plays a role in associated pathologies in these tissues), before providing a detailed review of the mechanobiology of the common blinding disease, glaucoma. Mechanical stimuli are intimately linked with the pathology of glaucoma, both in terms of altered homeostasis of the eye's internal pressure control system and in the response of neural cells to elevated pressure in the eye. A complex array of mechanosensory elements (stretch-activated ion channels, integrins, G protein-coupled receptors) work together with intersecting networks of mechanotransducing pathways in cells of both the posterior and anterior eye in glaucoma. Despite intense research efforts over the past decades, much remains unknown about the mechanobiology of glaucoma. Continued investigation of glaucomatous mechanobiology is important, as it may reveal novel targets for treating this challenging disease.

Indexed as

Atomic force microscopyDiseasesMechanisms of disease

Identifiers

PMID40621053
PMCPMC12227313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.