Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620907›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025

To chew or not to chew? Exploring the influence of scented chew toys on puppy chewing.

Rituparna Sonowal, Nathaniel J Hall, Anastasia C Stellato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rituparna SonowalDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Nathaniel J HallDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Anastasia C StellatoDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chewing and mouthing are natural oral behaviors in dogs, particularly during puppyhood, yet owners report these as nuisance behaviors. The provision of appropriate enrichment items, such as scented chew toys, are often recommended to reduce these undesirable behaviors. Nevertheless, the influence of providing scented chew toys on chewing and mouthing behavior in puppies has not been investigated. Methods: We collected data on engagement levels in dogs ( Results: During observation sessions, puppies spent more time interacting with ( Discussion: The findings suggest that scent can enhance engagement with chew toys, and although chew toys did not influence owner perceptions, future research should evaluate the use of structured owner-implemented training strategies on mitigating unwanted chewing or mouthing behavior in dogs.

Indexed as

behaviorchewingdogsengagementmouthingwelfare

Identifiers

PMID40620907
PMCPMC12226495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.