Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620878›Full record

ArticlePhysica A2024

Unsupervised pattern and outlier detection for pedestrian trajectories using diffusion maps.

Fanqi Zeng, Nikolai Bode, Thilo Gross, Martin Homer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fanqi ZengSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TW, UK.
Nikolai BodeSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TW, UK.
Thilo GrossHelmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity (HIFMB), 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Martin HomerSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TW, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 222506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The movement of pedestrian crowds is studied both for real-world applications and to gain fundamental scientific insights into systems of self-driven particles. Trajectory data describes the dynamics of pedestrian crowds at the level of individual movement paths. Analysing such data is a central challenge in pedestrian dynamics research, coupled with increasing data availability this implies a need for efficient methods to identify key features of the captured crowd dynamics. In this paper, we show that diffusion maps, an unsupervised manifold learning method, can be used for this purpose. We show how to build an informative feature space by defining a set of observables from trajectories. We use our diffusion map approach to analyse pedestrian movement on a stadium-shaped track, and during egress from a room, considering hundreds of trajectories for each scenario. We first verify that our diffusion map analysis can recover known leading variables that determine the system dynamics. Then, we show how our analysis facilitates a qualitative comparison of the dynamics inherent in entire data sets, by contrasting experimental with numerically simulated data. Finally, we establish how our approach can be used to automatically detect outliers that show behaviour distinct to others. These results indicate that our work can contribute a computationally efficient and unsupervised approach to analyse pedestrian dynamics without needing much prior knowledge of the data. We suggest this could be useful for automatically monitoring live data, or as an initial step to inform a subsequent analysis.

Indexed as

Diffusion mapsDimensionality reductionModel validationOutlier detectionPedestrian dynamicsTrajectory analysis

Identifiers

PMID40620878
PMCPMC7617868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.