ArticleCureus2025
Near Miss Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancies: A Case Series of Diagnosis With Point-of-Care Ultrasound and an Independent Review of Radiology Images.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First-trimester pregnancy complications are common in the emergency department, with ectopic pregnancy being the leading cause of maternal mortality in this period. Emergency physicians play a critical role in early diagnosis and management, with proficiency in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) being an essential skill. Even when comprehensive radiology ultrasound is also available, independent image review remains crucial to ensure that subtle findings are not missed in this timely diagnosis. We present two cases of ruptured ectopic pregnancy initially evaluated in community emergency departments. Both cases involved lower abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and positive pregnancy tests. In each instance, transabdominal POCUS performed during initial evaluation identified concerning findings, including adnexal masses with complex echogenicity and pelvic free fluid. Despite comprehensive radiology ultrasound interpretations not confirming ectopic pregnancy, the emergency physician's reassessment of imaging raised concern for rupture, prompting urgent gynecologic intervention. Surgical exploration confirmed ruptured ectopic pregnancy in both cases, requiring operative management. Both patients had favorable postoperative outcomes. Ectopic pregnancy remains a high-risk condition necessitating thorough evaluation. These cases highlight the crucial role of POCUS and independent ultrasound interpretation by emergency physicians in preventing diagnostic delays. Recognizing subtle imaging findings, especially in cases where radiology interpretations are inconclusive, is critical for timely intervention. Emergency physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion and collaborate with gynecology and radiology colleagues to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.