ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2025
Social support groups and policy recommendations for managing type 2 diabetes: perspective of healthcare professionals in Ghana.
Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the Care Gap: Family Support for Adults Living with Diabetes Mellitus in Limpopo Province, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the last decades, non-communicable diseases such as diabetes have remarkably increased due to rapid urbanization, unhealthy lifestyles, and ageing. The World Health Organization (WHO) indicates that the "diabetes epidemic" will continue in the coming decades, yielding enormous human and economic costs around the world. This study explores healthcare workers' views on social support groups and policy recommendations for managing type 2 diabetes in Ghana. Method: This study utilized a facility-based cross-sectional qualitative research design to explore healthcare workers' views on social support groups and policy recommendations for managing type 2 diabetes in Ghana between January and May 2023. Health workers who worked in the three selected regional hospitals for at least one year and at the diabetic clinics of the three selected regional hospitals of the respective regions at the time of this study were included. The study used purposive sampling to select 12 health workers (Nurses) as key informants. One (1) facility head of each facility and three (3) health workers, each working in the diabetic clinic of each regional hospital, were selected for key informant interviews. The interviews were recorded and transcribed in English. Notes from the interview were transcribed after the key informant interview. Data was imported into the Nvivo 7 software. The results were presented as prose, analyzed, and discussed in themes. Results: Major challenges facing people living with diabetes were the cost of medication, limited NHIS coverage, frequent morbidity and the chronic nature of the disease, putting psychological pressure on the patients. The policy recommendation was on mass education and the expansion of NHIS coverage. Conclusion: The study has noted some significant challenges faced in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus in Ghana. Addressing the diabetes epidemic in Ghana requires a comprehensive and multi-pronged approach, focusing on prevention, early detection, access to care, and diabetes education. Implementing the policy recommendations outlined in this study can significantly improve diabetes management in Ghana, reduce the burden of the disease, and enhance the overall health and well-being of the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.