Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620765›Full record

ArticlePsychologica Belgica2025

Psychometric Validation of the Gaming Disorder Scale for Adolescents (GADIS-A) in Dutch Among Flemish Adolescents.

Eva Grosemans, Rozane De Cock, Lowie Bradt, Huub Boonen, Bart Soenens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva GrosemansMedia Culture and Policy Lab, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7035-8313
Rozane De CockMedia Culture and Policy Lab, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-0700
Lowie BradtDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-5632
Huub BoonenInstitute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-1931
Bart SoenensDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1581-3656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gaming Disorder Scale for Adolescents (GADIS-A, Paschke, Austermann & Thomasius, 2020) was the first screening tool for gaming disorder based on the new ICD-11 criteria. In order to increase the international applicability of the GADIS-A, the current study aimed to validate the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the instrument. It was validated in a survey among 1773 Flemish (= Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) video game playing adolescents. EFA and CFA were performed to check the factor structure. The Video Game Addiction Test (VAT), gaming time, passion for gaming, Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents (GADIS-P), sensation seeking, impulsivity, adolescents' school and social life, and simulated and monetary gambling were employed to derive construct validity, and life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety to check criterion validity. Analyses suggested a two-factor structure in the Dutch GADIS-A, similar to the original study: the first factor relates to negative consequences, while the second factor reveals cognitive-behavioral symptoms. Both subscales and the total scale showed acceptable-to-good internal consistency (

Indexed as

addictive behavioradolescentsgaming disorderICD-11screeningvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40620765
PMCPMC12227078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.